L'alliance (ASF)



Don Hank 2016-12-09 by Don Hank  -    

Trump on China market economy status

Donald Trump has made some angry statements about the Chinese manipulation of its export market. First of all, does he have a valid point and secondly, what is he likely to do about this if he does?

In the early 1970s President Richard Nixon eliminated the gold standard in US monetary policy. This was a threat to the US dollar.

To compensate for this risk, Nixon did two things: 

1) he made a petrodollar agreement with the Saudis whereby the US would defend the Saudi royal family in return for their charging only US dollars for their oil. This policy helped prop up the value of the USD. (bloomberg revelation)

2) At the same time, he promoted the idea of granting China Most Favored Nation status, which US policy forbade to be given to communist countries. This status would enable the US to trade with China and would allow Americans to purchase goods at a lower price, effectively offsetting the lower value of the dollar caused by the loss of the gold standard.

The choice of China as a trading partner was no doubt intended to drive a wedge between that country and Russia, the country that the US government most feared. This was confusing to many Americans, who wondered why one communist country could be allowed to trade with the US while another could not.

Most naively believed the US when it said the proposal was about trade. In fact it was highly political.

Most favored nation status for China was not approved during Nixon's administration but a subsequent administration finally passed it, based on a false propaganda message that this would give the US a major advantage by allowing the Chinese to buy from the US and boost our economy.

Despite this propaganda, an enormous trade deficit arose with China and it only grows bigger every year.

Incredibly, this old Russia-China double standard has survived for over 60 years, well into the 21st Century, where the US has slapped sanctions on Russia while rewarding China with virtually free trade conditions, even though both countries are seen as a military threat and the favored one is communist while the disadvantaged one is not.  Clearly, the idea of creating a divide between China and Russia, at Russia's expense, is part of Western foreign policy and it has failed colossally so far, just like most policies that are sold to the public for one ostensible purpose but are based on another -- ulterior -- motive.

Today, there is less justification for such a pro-China, anti-Russia policy than ever because -- largely as a result of this meddling -- Russia and China have become stronger economic and military partners that together are now seen in the West as a threat to US hegemony.

Now for the first time in 60 years, a US president is challenging this old time worn policy of favoring China and making Russia a scapegoat for all Western ills. President-elect Donald Trump has spoken of conciliation between the US and Russia in his campaign and now speaks increasingly harshly of China.

No one knows if this harshness will translate into policy because Trump often says things and then changes his mind or makes promises that he later realizes he cannot keep.

The bone of contention in US-China relations (and in EU-China relations) is the fact that the WTO had in 2001 declared that China was a non market economy and had issued various criteria for determining its progress in acquiring market economy status (MES), a status that would allow trade with the West with little or no tariffs or duties levied on Chinese goods.

There is currently no question that China does not have a market economy because the government still subsidizes certain goods such as steel, aluminum and ceramics, which are therefore still subject to trade duties in various Western countries.

Now in 2001, the WTO granted a limited trade status for China despite its not being a market economy, and gave China 15 years to prove itself.

During the first 15 years, according to the WTO protocol, the standard price is taken as the internal market price in China of the good in question, or alternatively, the price observed in a similar country (“surrogate” country) for said good. The deviation indicates the degree of government influence and hence the height of the trade barrier applied in the West. The latter method has been used in the EU.

After these 15 years have elapsed, this alternative method may no longer be used. The deadline is upon us -- December 2016.
However, the Chinese government site xinhuanet.com  interprets the protocol loosely, and wrongly, as follows:

…according to the international rule, the protocols for China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001 dictate that China will automatically switch over to market economy status when the Surrogate Country approach expires on Dec. 11, 2016.

Going hand in hand with the granting of most favored nation status to China was President Carter's decision to confer diplomatic relations on China, which mandated cutting off relations with Taiwan, angering the Taiwanese.

By accepting a phone call from the Taiwanese president last week, Trump showed that he may in fact be weighing reversing, or at least modifying, policies established in the Nixon and Carter administrations regarding China.

China's reaction to both the Taiwan phone call and his remarks about Chinese chicanery was anger.

Coupled with Trump's kind gestures toward Russia, this all adds up to seismic rumblings that signal a possible geopolitical plate shift in US foreign policy.

Trump will need to exercise extreme caution and take a crash course in diplomacy to see us through the next 4 years without a major misstep. However, if we analyze the approaches taken by Nixon and Carter, we see that they were radical upsets of the world order and each served to strongly favor some nations while sullying others. We have come to see this as the American way.

Donald J. Trump has the opportunity to restore a balance without stepping too hard on certain toes. He has it within his power, for example, to oppose free trade agreements, like TPP, which are designed to snub China and Russia. After all, Trump says he believes in free trade, and free trade is free trade, not a political weapon to punish foes. Will he be wise enough to recognize this and respect everyone's interests?

Unfortunately, Trump probably has no US advisors who will sway him not to favor some nations while slighting others. Nonetheless, such a balanced approach to foreign affairs would be wise. Vladimir Putin is a master of this approach. He calls it the multipolar world.

Don Hank
Correspondent of the "Alliance for the Sovereignty of France" in the USA

Permanent link

Share :  

Note aux lecteurs du site

To provide your contribution or suggestions, email to us.

Version audio


Lors de la conférence de presse de février 1965, Charles De Gaulle nous parle du rôle international de l'or.

« Bienvenue ! La Direction de souverainete-france vous remercie de votre visite »
Site hébergé par SAS OVH - Code du site réalisé sous © et avec la collaboration de bénévoles sans outils web  -  pour navigateurs HTML5 IE, OPERA, Chrome et firefox (1024x768 minimum)
La direction a fait les démarches nécessaire pour toutes les autorisations de publications d'images et des textes. Merci de bien vouloir signaler toutes mentions de copyright © omises. Le site et concepteurs ne peuvent être responsables ni du contenu ni des avis éventuellement exposés

Mentions légales

Propriétaire du site Internet "souverainete-france":
Bernard Chalumeau - Membre fondateur "Alliance pour la souveraineté de la France" (loi 1901)
BP 20 - 77411 Claye Souilly

Propriété et hébergeur : - Le nom des domaines "souverainete-france" (org, fr, com) appartiennent à M.Bernard Chalumeau - Les sites sont hébergés par SAS OVH
Important: Les droits de propriété intellectuelle afférent aux sites "souverainete-france" appartiennent à Monsieur Bernard Chalumeau.
Toute utilisation, reproduction, diffusion, commercialisation, modification de toute ou partie du site, sans l’autorisation de l'Alliance pour la souveraineté de la France est prohibée et pourra entraînée des actions et poursuites judiciaires telles que notamment prévues par le code de la propriété intellectuelle et/ou le code civil.

Objet statutaire de l'Alliance pour la souveraineté de la France (J.O du 31/01/1998) : L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE est un cercle de réflexion politique, économique, culturelle et sociale.
Elle a notamment pour but de réunir et de coordonner l’action et la réflexion de ses membres, de contribuer au débat public par des études et des analyses, particulièrement par l’édition et/ou la réunion de textes de référence de ceux qui tiennent à l’indépendance nationale (législative, politique, institutionnelle, administrative, territoriale, militaire, diplomatique, énergétique, fiscale, patrimoniale, économique, monétaire, bancaire, industrielle, commerciale, agricole, écologique, numérique, culturelle, linguistique, sociale, et autres), au respect de la souveraineté de la France qui est « une, indivisible, inaliénable et imprescriptible » et du principe de la compétence de la compétence.
L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE propose des alternatives à toute démarche, à tout traité, à tout acte, projeté ou existant, qui contreviendrait à ces principes au sens des membres de l’association, ou à ceux de la Constitution de la Vème République approuvée par référendum, norme suprême du peuple français, étant entendu que tout texte adopté par le biais d’un référendum ne peut être modifié ou abrogé que par référendum.
L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE a vocation à conduire sa réflexion et son action tant au plan national qu’international.
Elle promeut l’unité de la Nation française, de son identité et de sa culture, et la pérennité des français en tant que peuple, par le respect de la protection universelle de tout humain.
Elle diffuse les résultats de ses réflexions à la population ainsi qu’aux décideurs, y compris politiques, par tous moyens de communication usuels, sans restriction, et notamment par le biais de son site Internet.
Elle agit par ses propres moyens et par ceux des associations adhérentes.

Note concernant les cookies:
Ce site utilise les cookies pour son bon fonctionnement. Pour en savoir plus
Toute données enregistrées lors d'une adhésion dont @ip sont traitées en toute confidentialité avec droit de consultation/rectification par l'intéressé