Europe
Le 20-04-2019 par B. Chalumeau -
How to abolish the fatal Aachen Treaty. This article completes the article "About the illegality of the Aachen Treaty", published here recently, which should be referred to for further details. 1)Explanatory memorandum: Violations of national and international law are so many and so unacceptable in the Aachen Treaty that they constitute solid foundations for abolishing it, provided that the ad hoc entities have the will to do so. Its national and international consequences are so great for our properties, our freedom, our sovereignty and for our very lives, as it threatens peace in Europe and in the world, that nothing must be neglected at any level from the ordinary citizen to the statesman to oppose its implementation. 2) Abolition for violations of French and German national law: 2.1) Violations of French national law:
There are probably similar violations of German law.
In peacetime, Article L2 of the Military Justice Code stipulates that: "Offenses committed by members of the armed forces or against them fall under common law jurisdictions specialized in military matters in the cases provided for in Article L. 111-1. Except these cases, they fall under common law jurisdictions. " Article 67 of the Constitution “relieves the Head of State during the exercise of his mandate from the risk of being brought before any French court or administrative authority to be required to testify or to be the subject of an action, an act of information, instruction or prosecution” and the Constitutional Law N ° 2007-238 of February 23, 2007 having abolished the criminal responsibility of the members of the government in case of conspiracy against the security of the state initially provided for in Article 68 of the Constitution, it can not be prosecuted under the Military Code Justice in peacetime. President Chirac, aware of what he had set in motion and anxious to preserve his successors, had surreptitiously suppressed this article which gave an essential right to the sovereign people from whom it had to be stripped. In wartime, Article L3 of the Military Code of Justice stipulates that: "Offenses under the jurisdiction of the Territorial Courts of the Armed Forces and Military Tribunals to the Armed Forces shall be prosecuted, examined and tried according to the rules of this Code". However, in accordance with Article 67 of the Constitution, the Head of State can not be brought before these courts. In conclusion, we can see that the head of state can not be prosecuted if, as here, he communitarizes the French weapons, including nuclear weapons, with a foreign state. This is not surprising, because jurists drafting constitution can not imagine that it could come to the idea of a head of state to share the supreme weapons of his country with a foreign country. The primary function of any head of state is to preserve them for the exclusive use of the state he leads, being, in general, chief of the armed forces … 2.2.1) Instruments to remedy this: Apart from the ineffective instruments of the Military Code of Justice, French constitutional law opens multiple possibilities to abolish this Treaty. However, it turns out that the Head of State, disregarding the principles of separation of powers and independence of the Justice, by placing his close collaborators and / or members of his party and the ENA to the main key positions of the State that such as the Constitutional Council, the Court of Accounts, the Court of Cassation, the Court of Appeal, the Council of State, the National Assembly, the Prosecutor General at the Court of Cassation, holds all the key parts of the State with an iron hand in a steel glove, immunizing him from any criminal offense during his term of office. Under these conditions, although our laws permit, it is illusory to seek to abolish the Aachen Treaty by resorting to the Constitutional Council. The proof being that, if this had been possible, as is the case in a democratic system, several referendums would have already been presented to the French people, as these provisions of the Aachen Treaty seriously undermine the exercise of national sovereignty. It was not the case. It has also been seen that this Treaty entered into force without any other form of trial since the Franco-German Parliamentary Assembly it establishes, has already met in Paris on March 25, 2019. 2.2 Violation of German national law: It is quite possible that the aforementioned violations of French law also violate German Basic Law. It is therefore of utmost importance that the Constitutional Court of Karlsruhe be seized of these points. 3) Violation of international law: 3.1) Violation of European Union rules:
3.1.1) Instruments to remedy this: These instruments exist because:
The abovementioned violations of the fundamental principles of the Union by the Treaty should make it inevitable to refer the matter to the Council of the European Union, both the decisions already taken by France and Germany under the Aachen Treaty and the the Moseberg agreements are important for the other EU Member States: creation of a new European tax, immigration and asylum policy, fiscal convergence, recasting of the Economic and Monetary Union, the European Stability Mechanism, backstop, creation of a euro zone budget, communitarization of the French nuclear weapons, manufacturing and sales of weapons etc … All these elements have a considerable impact on the exercise of the sovereignty of the other Member States of the Union. Impact so considerable that it is very singular that this Council has not already been seized.
3.2) Violations of international law:
3.2.1) Instruments to remedy this: This is the most important point with regard to the abolition of the Aachen Treaty as the importance of the violation of the Moscow Treaty is enormous, because it can lead to an international conflict of huge importance taking into account the Franco-German provisions taken not only under the Aachen Treaty, but also under the Meseberg Declaration. If telephone conversations and summit meetings between the British, American, Russian, German and French leaders in view of this abolition fail, the British, American and Russian leaders may bring the matter before the International Court of The Hague, where is the function of regulating the different states. Of course, the member states of the Union such as Spain, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Czech Republic, Italy, Holland, Austria and Denmark whose territories can be nibbled by changes in the frontiers under the Eurodistrcts and Euroregions provided for in the Treaty of Aix la Chapelle (AEBR), can also bring the matter before the International Court of Justice. 4) Strategy: 4.1) First step to take: Apart from the steps vis-à-vis the French Constitutional Council, which, as we have seen, have virtually no chance of success given the specificity of the regime in place, the approach to be undertaken in the first place is to seize the Constitutional Court of Karlsruhe. This referral is of paramount importance for property, the life of the members of the Union and peace in the next 50 years in Europe. The decision of the Karlsruhe Court is crucial. Indeed: :
In the latter case, it will be for Great Britain, the United States of America, Russia and the above-mentioned European Union States to refer the Aachen Treaty to the International Court of Justice to be abolished. A very likely outcome given the blatant violations of the Moscow Treaty by France and Germany. 5) Special case of Germany's access to permanent membership in the UN Security Council: This access can only be done after the amendment of Article 23 of the UN Charter, in accordance with Articles 108 and 109 of this Charter. This may be a very delicate change considering that in addition to receiving a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly, the approval of the permanent members of the Security Council must also be obtained. National and international conventions are consubstantial with the sovereignty of nations and peoples. They must be respected by everyone everywhere. The durability of world peace is at this price. Bernard CHALUMEAU Lien permanent Note aux lecteurs du sitePour apporter votre contribution ou suggérer un article, écrivez nous. |
« Bienvenue ! La Direction de souverainete-france vous remercie de votre visite »
Site hébergé par SAS OVH - Code du site réalisé sous © et avec la collaboration de bénévoles sans outils web - pour navigateurs HTML5 IE, OPERA, Chrome et firefox (1024x768 minimum) La direction a fait les démarches nécessaire pour toutes les autorisations de publications d'images et des textes. Merci de bien vouloir signaler toutes mentions de copyright © omises. Le site et concepteurs ne peuvent être responsables ni du contenu ni des avis éventuellement exposés |
Propriétaire du site Internet "souverainete-france":
Bernard Chalumeau - Membre fondateur
"Alliance pour la souveraineté de la France" (loi 1901)
BP 20 - 77411 Claye Souilly
Objet statutaire de l'Alliance pour la souveraineté de la France (J.O du 31/01/1998) : L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE est un cercle de réflexion politique, économique, culturelle et sociale.
Elle a notamment pour but de réunir et de coordonner l’action et la réflexion de ses membres, de contribuer au débat public par des études et des analyses, particulièrement par l’édition et/ou la réunion de textes de référence de ceux qui tiennent à l’indépendance nationale (législative, politique, institutionnelle, administrative, territoriale, militaire, diplomatique, énergétique, fiscale, patrimoniale, économique, monétaire, bancaire, industrielle, commerciale, agricole, écologique, numérique, culturelle, linguistique, sociale, et autres), au respect de la souveraineté de la France qui est « une, indivisible, inaliénable et imprescriptible » et du principe de la compétence de la compétence.
L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE propose des alternatives à toute démarche, à tout traité, à tout acte, projeté ou existant, qui contreviendrait à ces principes au sens des membres de l’association, ou à ceux de la Constitution de la Vème République approuvée par référendum, norme suprême du peuple français, étant entendu que tout texte adopté par le biais d’un référendum ne peut être modifié ou abrogé que par référendum.
L’ALLIANCE POUR LA SOUVERAINETE DE LA FRANCE a vocation à conduire sa réflexion et son action tant au plan national qu’international.
Elle promeut l’unité de la Nation française, de son identité et de sa culture, et la pérennité des français en tant que peuple, par le respect de la protection universelle de tout humain.
Elle diffuse les résultats de ses réflexions à la population ainsi qu’aux décideurs, y compris politiques, par tous moyens de communication usuels, sans restriction, et notamment par le biais de son site Internet.
Elle agit par ses propres moyens et par ceux des associations adhérentes.
Note concernant les cookies:
Ce site utilise les cookies pour son bon fonctionnement. Pour en savoir plus
Toute données enregistrées lors d'une adhésion dont @ip sont traitées en toute confidentialité avec droit de consultation/rectification par l'intéressé